DEVIANT LOGIC

 PHL/CSC 219/419

Henry E. Kyburg

 

HENRY KYBURG

Fall, 2004

Tue, Thur 11:05--12:20

Office Hours

Tue, Thur: 10:30--11:00

in Latt 520

Wed: 10:00 -- 12:00

in CSB 720

AND BY APPOINTMENT
 

Many people think of logic as cut and dried and settled, and so it is if you think only of the classical first order logic that was essentially given by Russell and Whitehead. But unless one takes a very parochial view of logic, there are many alternatives, which I am grouping under the title of "deviant logic". They include the logic of strict implication (C.I.Lewis), various modal logics, various forms of intensional logic, temporal logic, many valued logic, probabilistic logic, nonmonotonic logic, deontic logic, and within mathematics itself, intuitionistic logic. One of the more recent variants is paraconsistent logic, which comes in a variety of forms, and allows us to treat inconsistent sets of premises sensibly.

Each of these logics has a rational and a purpose, and many of them are closely related. To explore them, even in the reltively superficial way that is open to us, will give some idea of the power and generality of the logical way of doing things.

 

 Class Participation: 10%

Homework: 20%

 There WILL be two one hour examinations:

30%

 Term Research Paper.

40%

OFFICIAL TEXT: SUSAN HACKING, DEVIANT LOGIC, FUZZY LOGIC

Chicago University Press, 1996

 Useful secondary sources:

Brian Chellas, Modal Logic, Cambridge University Press, 1995

Graham Priest, Introduction to Non-Classical Logic, Cambridge Press, 2001.

 

 GRADUATE STUDENTS (CSC/PHL 419):

"Extra Requirements" consist of an oral presentation, and, of course, a longer and more sophisticated final paper.

Max (The Enforcer)

 Some of these pictures, as well as the background logo, reflect the activities of Kyburg Black Angus Farms which has nothing to do with Logic.

 

This course is undergoing complete revision.

Topics, Homework, and Notes will be available soon.

DATE

 TOPIC

 HOMEWORK

 NOTES
R, 9/2/04 Introduction Haack: Introduction  
T, 9/7/04 Alternatives Haack: Ch 1  
R, 9/9/04 Deviance Haack: Ch 2  
T, 9/14/04 Deviance Haack Ch 3  
R, 9/16/04 Future Contingents Haack Ch 4  
T, 9/21/04 Intuitionism Haack Ch 5  
R, 9/23/04 Intuitionism    
T, 9/28/04 Vagueness Haack Ch 6  
R, 9/30/04 Singular terms; QM Haack Ch 7,8  
T, 10/5/04 Conditionals Chellas, Chapter 2  

Susannah (The REAL enforcer)

 

DATE

TOPIC

 HOMEWORK

 NOTE
R, 10/7/04 S-5 Chellas, Ch 1.2  
T, 10/12/04 Models Chellas, Ch 2.2  
R, 10/14//04 Soundness, Completeness Chellas, Ch 2.7  
T,10/19/04  EXAMINATION 1  open book, open notes, mainly on Haack  
R, 10/21/04 Nonmonotonic Reasoning Ginsberg, ed., Intro, Kaufman, 1987
T, 10/26/04 Reiter AIJournal, 13, 1980 p. 81-132
R, 10/28/04 Moore AIJournal, 25, 1980 p. 75-94
T, 11/4/04 Models and Axioms   Konolidge

 

 

 

 

Being rational is often an alternative to going head to head! 

 

 

R, 11/4/04
Dummett: Deduction
Kyburg,Teng Ch. 11
T, 11/9/04
Haack: Deduction
 
R, 11/1104
Fuzzy Logic
Zadeh  
T,11/16/04
Fuzzy Logic
Haack  
R, 11/18/04
Real Fuzzy Logic
   
T, 11/23/04
Haack on Quine
   
T, 11/30/04
Priest
   
R 12/2/0
Priest
   
T 12/7/0
review
   
R 12/9/04
EXAMINATION 2
open book, open notes, mainly on nonmon & paraconsistent
 

But what shall I write about?

There are a few sample topics at the end of the page.

 

DRAFT OF FINAL PAPER: (REQUIRED FOR WRITING CREDIT) (OPTIONAL FOR OTHERS)

DUE NOON MONDAY DECMBER 13

FINAL PAPER DUE NOON FRIDAY DECEMBER 17

Suzannah on the left. Zorro on the right.
   

 

PAPER TOPICS (examples only)

Inuitionism and Michael Dummett
Quine
In Defense of Zadeh
 
 
 
 
 
Discuss the pros and cons of the reducibility of default logic to probability.
Suppose the negation of a justification in default logic is highly probable. Then what?